Hawley-Green Revival in Syracuse

I live in Sedgwick Farm, one of several historic neighborhoods in Syracuse.  Sedgwick was built in the early 20th century.  Now, one of the few 19th century neighborhoods in Syracuse, Hawley-Green, is undergoing a revival, spurred in part by an influx of gay and lesbian residents into the area.  See the following story done by Syracuse-area public radio station, WRVO:

http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wrvo/news.newsmain?action=article&ARTICLE_ID=1273374

 

Ground Zero - Business vs. Memorial

We've talked about how the rebuilding process at Ground Zero has split the site into a memorial sector and a business sector.  Two weeks ago I heard Professor James Young speak about the importance of remembrance, and I came away with a better understanding of the view held by some of the 9/11 families.  The memorial reinforces our memory with something visual, something concrete, so that we will never forget what happened.  Professor Young is an expert on memorials, especially Holocaust memorials, and he was on a jury that reviewed plans for the WTC Memorial.  He also spoke about the Vietnam Memorial in Washington and the effect it has on visitors, particularly veterans and families of fallen soldiers.  He quoted its architect, Maya Ying Lin, as saying, "You look inside the landscape as you look inside yourself."

 

Zellner and Watson: Central Park and 610 North Buchanan Boulevard

Because we ran out of time in doing our presentations yesterday, we were unable to hear from Jon Zellner, who is doing his research paper on Central Park, and many in the class were unable to hear Andrew Watson's presentation on 610 North Buchanan Boulevard, the house where members of Duke lacrosse team lived or congregated, and the physical epicenter of controversy in the Duke lacrosse case last year. 

 
Central Park was established in the 19th century and was planned in part by Frederick Law Olmsted.  Zellner's paper looks at how the park has related to, and contrasted with, the surrounding, intensively urbanized landscape of Manhattan.  In particular, Zellner considers the degree to which the park has been faithful to Olmsted’s original intentions for it, which were: (1) accessibility (equal access); (2) safety and hospitality; (3) interaction with nature; and (4) stress relief and the promotion of physical wellbeing.   The degree to which the park has remained faithful to its original intentions and the degree to which the park has evolved touches on the tension between preservation and founding in the practice of place.
 
Watson looks at how the identity of a particular place has been created through contestation. 610 North Buchanan Boulevard has in many cases embodied tensions between town and gown and within the campus community, tensions that exist both for Duke University and for college campuses in general. Watson says, “Relations between Duke and the Durham community stretch back over a hundred years, a relationship strained by issues of race and class. On campus, in recent times, the Duke administration and fraternities have conflicted on Duke’s desire to make fraternities less exclusive in the social fabric of the university and to curb alcohol consumption. Duke’s students, faculty, and administration had antagonistic images of 610 Buchanan. And liberal elements of the Duke faculty used 610 Buchanan as a symbol of social conflicts to promote their own social agenda and fields of study related to race, gender, class, and privilege.” The result is an interesting study not only about a very tragic case but about how even the character of a single house can be the product of contestation by competing social forces.
 

Re: Jaguar population threatened by immigration fence

The effects of the immigration fence on the wildlife in the Southwest and Northern Mexico is often overlooked in the immigration debate.  I would just like to add to what Chris wrote about with the example of the Jaguars.  Because the wall is being constructed under the department of Homeland Security they have the power to waive all environmental regulations that exist in order to protect the landscape.  They justify these actions by suggesting the Wall is a security measure that protects us from terrorists.  To date, the Border Patrol along the entire US/Mexico border has not caught any terrorists.  They have detained something like 27 suspected terrorists, which simply means that these detainees have been to a country in the Middle East (these statistics come from Borderlinks).  Homeland security says they are actually working to protect the environment because in the 2007 fiscal year they detained 19,000 migrants who would have left trash in the conservation areas in the border region (NY Times). 
The physical construction of a wall in the Sonoran Desert is so much more destructive to the environment.  When they build the wall they clear the area around at least 30-50 feet on either side.  This leaves a horrible scar on the landscape, and a terrible barrier all wildlife cannot cross. Similarly, it is not like the border region is all barren desert to begin with.  There are several small ranching communities that are virtually being invaded by border patrol, the National Guard, and spy towers.  The border also crosses the center of the Tohono o’Odham Nation.  In order to construct this wall, the United States government is excavating many burial grounds.  An archeologist friend of mine worked on one of these sites.  He was telling me how from the worksite he could see where they were building the wall.  He said he saw deer and rabbits cross the empty cleared land and just stare at the wall trying to decide what to do with it.  He said he felt morally conflicted excavating a burial ground and watching the wildlife.  On the other man he made friends with many people in the area, one of which had cut a whole in the wall and welded a door onto it.  He put a lock on it and charged people to let them in.  Chris is right, a wall will never stop people but it will always stop wildlife. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/23/us/23fence.html?pagewanted=all
 

Tibetan Uprising

Tibetan Region

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/guides/456900/456954/html/nn0page1.stm

In many regards, the recent uprising movement led by Buddhist monks in Tibet is a defense of a cultural Tibet which is in jeopardy of disappearance.  The Tibetan monks and native people of the greater Tibetan region are acting (violently, at times) to preserve Tibet as an autonomous region within China.

China has defended their actions of suppressing the movement on the grounds that Tibet has benefitted greatly from the increased contact with mainland China.  Indeed, it is indisputable that economically Tibet has experienced great expansion in recent years; concomitantly, Tibet has seen a large influx of non-Tibetans (Han Chinese and Hui Muslims) who have altered the physical and economic landscape.

Tibetans are struggling to maintain the place they have known for centuries.  While their violent actions of preservation through destruction are potentially counterproductive, a consideration of the fragility of their culture and place is valuable in understanding the current conflict.

For a compilation of news articles on the issues, see http://www.truthout.org/TibetUnderSiege.shtml.

Contact Blog Owner