A Different Kind of Local Food Movement: how buying groceries in Paris creates a sense of place

 In a world where the food system has become consolidated, industrialized, and globalized, Mark Lapping described how this creates “an acute loss of a sense of the local.” He describes several alternative agro-food models (AAFMs) that have been successful in the United States. I want to focus on how typical food shopping in France can contribute to some similar benefits.

I studied abroad in Paris last fall, where I lived downtown with my host mother. Paris is known for many of its open-air famers markets, one of my personal favorite places to go on Sunday mornings. But even in situations when Parisians aren’t buying directly from the farmer, the considerable smaller percentage of consolidation that in the U.S., definitely adds a community aspect to doing the groceries.   

Large supermarket chains, known as hypermarchés, do exist in France, just as they do here. However, from my experience they’re not used to the same degree. Artisanal culture is still thriving in France, and it is not uncommon for the family shopper to visit several local shops or markets each week to get different food products, instead of going to the supermarket. To get your bread, you go to la boulangerie, but for your sweeter pastries you go to la pâtisserie. La fromagerie is for cheese, la rôtisserie is for chicken, la charcuterie is for pork, and la boucherie is your typical butcher. Finally there is l’épicerie, small general stores that sell produce and dry goods. What’s even more interesting than the collection of small shops, is the fact that many didn’t even have distinct names. The name of my host mother’s favorite bakery was simply la boulangerie. However the fact that a different person or family owns each small shop helps establish them as places that get incorporated to the community.

This style of shopping further enhances the sense of community because repeat patrons are able to create relationships with the small business owners. My host mother would often refer the shop owners by name, and there was a sense of trust between her and her vendors. She counted on them for quality and better service. This kind of shopping may seem to be more time consuming, but the density of small shops means one never has to go farther than a couple blocks. So though it takes more effort than Americans are used to, it is definitely a more personal and social experience. I think that this helps to construct a stronger sense of place in each neighborhood.

As a temporary French citizen, I found this kind of local neighborhood shopping influenced my practice of place. Although I wasn’t there for long enough to create as strong relationships with the vendors, I became a regular at a few small shops in the area, and came to trust the quality there. So while the city is already divided into 20 neighborhoods (arrondissements), my neighborhood was definitely defined in respect to these small shops more that the fact that I lived in the 5th arrondissement. Instead of shopping at a huge Hannaford’s, that I had to drive to, in Paris, shopping for food in a more local, connected setting contributed to creating my concept of neighborhood, and my ability experience the culture. 

Privately Owned Public Space (POPS)

All of the news about Zuccotti Park because of Occupy Wall Street has gotten me thinking about Privately Owned Public Space (POPS). In 1961, a zoning incentive program was created in New York City. It encouraged private developers to create public spaces in or around their buildings in exchange for being allowed to make buildings taller than the zoning of an area would otherwise allow. Since the launch of the program, more than 3.5 million square feet of public space have been created (albeit with varying levels of success). Zuccotti Park, a POPS created in 1968, is currently owned and maintained by Brookfield Properties. The fact it is a POPS means that it does not close at night like most public parks, which is part of why it was chosen by Occupy Wall Street protesters.

 

Without getting into the politics of the protest (and whether it was legal, or right or wrong for the park to be cleared two weeks ago for cleaning), this has made me think about the unique ownership of POPS. While the owners of POPS do technically own the spaces and are responsible for maintaining them, they do not have the same rights that private property owners do. Likewise, the people who use POPS do not have any ownership over them, but are allowed to use them in ways that they could not use private property. So who has the more meaningful ownership of the space? Who gets to define the terms of the space—the people who build it or the people who chose to use it?

 

It can really go either way, but here, I think the Occupy Wall Street protesters demonstrate that it’s the latter. The owners can design a space and hope that the public will use it as planned. However, unless an activity is illegal, the owners have no actual say in how the public uses the space. The public can re-found the space as something completely different than what the owners planned and make it their own.

 

Contact Blog Owner